Just wondering if there was a conflict of interest since Verizon owns virtually every phone booth in Manhattah (well...close to all of them).

Where's the competition?

:)
Don

At 9:48 -0700 5/27/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Conflict of interest between what and what, precisely?

Verizon's contract with NYC is to provide services to NYC government.

(Empire City Subway is a separate issue, but there's no conflict either).

-alex

On Tue, 27 May 2003, Don Montalvo wrote:

 Wouldn't that be a serious conflict of interest? Verizon has a years
 old contract with NYC.

Don

At 8:09 -0700 5/27/03, "Jon Baer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>According to this article in Seattle times, Verizon plans for the network to
>remain closed to their customers only:
>
>http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/134812850_bthispeedsummit26.html
>
>(Verizon President Lawrence Babbio)
>
>-snip-
>But Babbio said its Wi-Fi service only will be available to Verizon's DSL
>subscribers and the company has no plans to offer a public Wi-Fi network.
>-snip-
>
> >- Jon

-- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to