It doesn't seem worth the bother at 100-200 kbps. What can you do with that trickle of bandwidth that you can't with a 9.6k modem? And modems over a cell phone are more reliable than these data services over the cell networks seem to be. My experience is with Sprint PCS, probably other services are much better, but there are problem whenever they mark your data as _LESS_ time of arrival sensitive than plain old voice data.
It's at 1Mbps to 10Mbps that it becomes a viable replacement for finding a nearby internet cafe. It's only a viable modem replacement at 100 kbps if they prioritise the packets above voice data. -- Daniel << When truth is outlawed; only outlaws will tell the truth. >> - RLiegh On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Anthony Townsend wrote: ]anyone tried this yet? claiming 100-130 kpbs, bursting to 200 kbps? ] ]launched Nov 18 ] ]-- ]NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ ]Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ ]Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/ ] -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
