yOn Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Dustin Goodwin wrote:
> "c) proposed NYC licensing of poles/etc. I have a problem with that -
> the licensee has no obligation to provide open access ("transport") to
> interested providers at reasonable rates."
>
> I was hoping Gale Brewers committee would have a hearing that
> specifically addresses the poll top franchise plan. We need a hearing on
> this where DOIT is *required* to testify. Please email her or Bruce Lai
> so we can build up some steam. I think she would probably like to hear
> it from someone other then me.
I will. I only recently started to pay attention to the NYC plans, and not
fully aware of all players, agendas and politics involved.
On other hand, I am sure that whoever is the licensee of poletop space
will probably fight the open access requirement tooth and nail - just like
any monopoly-to-be would fight, so it is going to be a struggle.
Alex Pilosov | DSL, Colocation, Hosting Services
President | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 877-PILOSOFT x601
Pilosoft, Inc. | http://www.pilosoft.com
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
