Again, this stuff needs to be said.  Too many people are willing to 
believe the best in spite of the track record.  Think of the Gingerbread 
Man ... ;-)

Dave Lane wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> Mike Cochrane wrote:
>   
>> Microsoft have released the specifications for their binary file formats:
>>      http://www.microsoft.com/interop/docs/officebinaryformats.mspx
>>     
>
> Comments to this article on Microsoft's own Brian Jones' blog
> http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/02/15/binary-documentation-doc-xls-ppt-and-translator-project-site-are-now-live.aspx
> indicate that this is an incomplete specification, i.e. insufficient for
> anyone to create actual interoperability with MS Office.  Others refer
> to the OOXML "standard", which has now been discredited as being
> un-usable.  Microsoft, themselves, say that they'll support ODF before
> they can support OOXML.
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/05/21/Microsoft-to-support-ODF-PDF-in-Office_1.html
>
> As I understand it, the specs that were released (extremely grudgingly)
> were only made available to fulfil penalty requirements by the European
> Union's finding against Microsoft regarding their anti-competitive
> business practices.
>
>   
>> Which are covered by the Microsoft Open Specification Promise:
>>      http://www.microsoft.com/interop/osp/default.mspx
>>     
>
> The Microsoft OSP is not considered suitable protection for developers.
>  The big question: why didn't they simply use the already widely
> accepted GPL (General Public License)?  That would've made everyone
> happy.  The fact that they didn't is proof enough that they've got their
> own agenda (i.e. it's a scam).  But don't just take my word for it:
>
> Another Reason Microsoft's OSP Isn't Good Enough -
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080326151405938
>
> Verdict In: Microsoft OSP Is No GPL
> http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26000
>
> Microsoft OSP is a pie crust promise
> http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2125
>
> Microsoft's Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/osp-gpl.html
>
> Not exactly fringe opinions...
>
> Dave
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to