Yes, I'm sure that sympathy is what James is looking for.  Regarding
the 'novice' comment.  This is a php user group and his issue is 100%
political.  If James wants progress with this issue then there are
channels to follow through with, even and including approaching nzlive
for a John Key endorsed private/public partnership.  But it appears
that James has already fenced himself off in a corner on this, has no
clear directives of what he wants to achieve (apart from sympathy) and
my 2 c is that this is not a good way of going about it.  Sure, I may
be wrong, and the likes of Twitter may become the nu-way of achieving
political success, so who knows...

On Apr 29, 11:57 am, Grant Paton-Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> Isn't it possible that commercial clients might sympathise with a
> complaint about unfair competition?  You could be right, but at the very
> least the point is not self-evident.
>
> And it is not clear on what basis you say James is being a "political
> novice".  Perhaps he has a good chance of success with the new
> administration.  They are going to have to make drastic cuts in some
> public expenditure and NZLive gives some hints about some soft targets.  
> Will it happen?  We'll have to wait and see but it is certainly not
> obvious which way things will go.
>
> All the best, Grant
>
> Kent Parker wrote:
> > Yes but, James, your commercial clients may be put off by your highly
> > public efforts to create awareness and in the process you are also
> > promoting nzlive.  From the few posts you have made here and the fact
> > that you have made them here indicate that you are a political novice,
> > that would make even Don Brash look like a pro, and that you are
> > possibly wasting your sweat.  There are soooo many factors tied up in
> > the existence of nzlive that give it justification to exist and your
> > argument is completely bereft of any legal backing.  Do recall
> > recently (since the global meltdown) a NZ clothing firm that laid off
> > most of its staff after a govt agency transferred their account from
> > them to a Chinese company?  What do you expect to achieve?  The sudden
> > termination of a 2 million dollar Govt enterprise.  No way.  'Aint
> > gonna happen.
>
> > On Apr 29, 11:38 am, James McGlinn <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Hi Kent,
>
> >>> Yours is a better site, James, what more do you need?
>
> >> Thanks for your feedback.  What we're looking for is awareness.
>
> >> We have an administration that talks about reducing wasted government  
> >> spending and avoiding duplication of private sector efforts on one  
> >> hand, but continues to fund exactly that with NZLive on the other.  It  
> >> seems hypocritical to us, and we hope others will agree.
>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> James McGlinn
> >> __________________________________
> >> CTO
> >> Eventfinder Limited
> >> Suite 106, Heards Building
> >> 2 Ruskin Street, Parnell, Auckland 1052
> >> Phone: +649 365 2342
> >> Mobile: +6421 633 234
>
> >> [email protected]  |  www.eventfinder.co.nz
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to