Surely even / would have been better than \.

---------------------------------------------------
Keri Henare

[e]    [email protected]
[m]    021 874 552
[w]    www.kerihenare.com

On 2/07/2009, at 11:29 AM, Neven MacEwan wrote:

>
> Mark
>
> If it becomes a huge issue then it will be 'fixed' it wouldn't be the
> first time a certain php language feature was 'improved'
>
> The great thing with open source, you don't get 'stuck' with  
> politically
> driven bad decisions, if it is truly bd it wil be fixed
>
> Neven
>
>
>> Yes, it's a shame that they didn't listen more to the users on this  
>> issue.
>>
>> I never really cared much for their explanation of the problem. It's
>> like they could see the trade-off: pissing off millions of beginner
>> developers and experienced PHP users VS fixing a very obscure
>> ambiguity issue with static functions that would only arise as the
>> result of poor package design. Choosing the privelege the latter was
>> the wrong choice in my opinion, and shows that these people have a
>> profound lack of insight.
>>
>> People everywhere said they wanted the p1::p2 syntax for namespaces,
>> but would also be ok if they had to use p1:::p2. They should have
>> listened. Time will tell, how costly this mistake is going to be for
>> PHP.
>>
>>
>>
>> Grüße,
>>
>> Mark Rickerby
>> http://maetl.net/
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Cell. +642102785644 | Email. [email protected]
>> PO Box 4452, Shortland Street, Auckland 1140, NZ
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug
To post, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to
[email protected]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to