[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485936#comment-13485936
 ] 

Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-409:
-------------------------------------

No you would not require OSGi jars in classpath for non OSGi usecases as 
provided scope dependencies are not transitive
                
> OSGi related dependencies should be set to provided scoped and not marked as 
> optional
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-409
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 0.5
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: osgi
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> Currently the OSGi related dependencies org.osgi.core and org.osgi.compendium 
> are marked as optional. Due to this packages under org.osgi.* are marked as 
> optional which is not correct. 
> As such dependencies are already marked as provided scope they would not be 
> included as part of transient dependencies. For more details refer to [1]
> Fix: The optional flag should be removed
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/njukyten6fdipts3

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to