[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13495252#comment-13495252
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-428:
------------------------------------

Thanks! 

(Just to avoid confusion) I think the new prefix is ":blobId:" not ":blobId".

The patch seems to contain a large IntelliJ specific header. I guess I can 
ignore it?

The PrefixContentIndex will most likely anyway have to be re-written (to use 
the oak-core classes and not the MicroKernel API), so I don't worry too much 
about it at the moment, but thanks for the heads-up.

                
> Binaries might get removed by garbage collection while still referenced
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-428
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-428
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>         Attachments: OAK-428.patch
>
>
> The [Microkernel 
> contract|http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-mk-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/api/MicroKernel.java]
>  specifies a specific format for references to binaries: ":blobId:<blobId>". 
> Currently oak-core uses a different format and thus risks premature garbage 
> collection of such binaries.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to