[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-447?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498059#comment-13498059
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-447:
-----------------------------------
I found an alternative fix to this. The root cause was in the handling of the
read-only case at the beginning of child(). That code didn't take the remove +
add situation into account and would result in a child builder that isn't
properly connected with the rest of the builder hierarchy.
I seem to have some trouble with svn access at the moment, so the fix is in
https://github.com/jukka/jackrabbit-oak/commit/a0aeefe5378d1f189ab38ca462af45096a55c1d7
until I manage to commit it.
> Adding a node with the name of a removed node can lead to an inconsistent
> hierarchy of node builders
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-447
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-447
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Attachments: OAK-447.patch
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
