[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13499210#comment-13499210
 ] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-452:
-----------------------------------

The suggested changes are on a branch of my github clone: 
https://github.com/mduerig/jackrabbit-oak/commits/nodebuilder-cleanup.

In a nutshell, I: 
* replaced the recurring one liners with private helper methods named after 
what actually is going on,
* simplified the {{child()}} method by factoring out the commonalities with the 
{{write()}} method,
* added a separate method for checking class invariants.

Most of the commits on my branch are quite simple changes, so it shouldn't be 
too difficult to follow my reasoning.

[~jukkaz], could you have a look?
                
> MemoryNodeBuilder improvements
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-452
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-452
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>
> As mentioned on OAK-447, OAK-448 the introduction of the reset method in 
> {{NodeBuilder}} lead to the breakdown of some of the class invariants that 
> held earlier. See also the FIXME tags in MemoryNodeBuilder. In addition the 
> code should be simplified where possible. Currently it is very hard to track 
> what's going on just by reading the code, Javadoc and test cases.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to