[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581230#comment-13581230
 ] 

Stefan Guggisberg commented on OAK-638:
---------------------------------------

bq. This pretty much means we should push down handling of the transient space 
to the MK implementation. I don't think the MK was designed with this in mind. 
My understanding so far is that we handle transient operations in oak-jcr (to a 
certain amount: RootImpl#PURGE_LIMIT) and persist those changes to a branch 
once over the limit.

+1, that's my understanding as well (see OAK-162).
                
> Avoid branch/merge for small commits
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-638
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The branch/merge features on the MicroKernel were initially introduced to 
> stage changes of large commits. Currently oak-core creates a branch even for 
> small changes like updating a property. I think this introduces quite some 
> overhead for scenarios with highly concurrent updates. E.g. think of a 
> twitter like application or a forum with comments. Well, basically user 
> generated content. These update tend to be rather small (couple of nodes) but 
> frequent and concurrent.
> Right now oak-core always does:
> - MK.branch()
> - MK.commit() to branch
> - MK.merge()
> For small commits, it ideally should do:
> - MK.commit() to trunk

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to