[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13647656#comment-13647656
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-808:
-----------------------------------
Good catch, thanks for the patch. I'm not sure whether this is the right thing
to do though since it changes the semantics of
{{TargetImportHandler#currentNamePathMapper()}}: without the patch a caller
would observe a certain mapping as it was when the name space map was returned
from {{currentNamePathMapper()}}, whereas with the patch a caller would observe
the mapping at it is at the time he looks into the map.
> Significant performance issue in TargetImportHandler's prefix mapping handling
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-808
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-808
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jcr
> Affects Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Lukas Eder
> Attachments: Screen Shot YourKit Profiling Session.png,
> TargetImportHandler.java.patch
>
>
> While playing around with Oak, I have observed a significant performance
> bottleneck in
> {code}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.xml.TargetImportHandler
> {code}
> The problem can be seen in the attached Screenshot taken from a Yourkit
> profiling session. The TargetImportHandler contains a reference to a
> "documentContext" ListMultimap, which acts like a stack of prefix - namespace
> mappings. To the outside, however, it is exposed as "documentPrefixMap", a
> regular prefix - namespace mapping map, which only references the last
> namespace for a prefix.
> What's problematic here: "documentPrefixMap" is eagerly copied from
> "documentContext" every time the latter is modified, which may happen a lot
> in upstream products, such as Adobe CQ5. Instead, "documentPrefixMap" should
> be a Map view exposing the desired data. An example implementation using
> Guava:
> {code}
> // Create this view once, in the constructor
> this.documentPrefixMap = Maps.transformValues(documentContext.asMap(),
> new Function<Collection<String>, String>() {
> @Override
> public String apply(Collection<String> input) {
> return Iterables.getLast(input, null);
> }
> });
> {code}
> The above implementation might work, as "documentPrefixMap" is a read-only
> view of the "documentContext" map. More explicit, verbose implementations may
> prove to be even faster.
> Before I write a patch, please let me know what you think. Having a live view
> may of course create concurrency issues, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
