[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13655994#comment-13655994
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-622:
-------------------------------------
updated the lucene index to match the fulltext interface in rev 1481861.
> Improve QueryIndex interface
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-622
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
> Priority: Minor
>
> The current QueryIndex interface is quite simple, but doesn't address some of
> the required features and more advanced optimizations that are possible:
> - For fulltext queries, it doesn't address the case where the index
> implementation has a different understanding of the fulltext condition than
> what is described in the JCR spec (the basic features).
> - For queries with "order by" it would be good to know if the index supports
> returning the data in sorted order, and if yes, how much slower that would be
> (if it is slower). So a index might have multiple strategies with different
> costs.
> - It's quite easy to misunderstand what getCost is supposed to do exactly.
> The new API should have a clearer solution here.
> - Even if the query doesn't have "order by", the index might return the data
> in a sorted way, which might help improving query performance (using a merge
> join)
> - The cost is currently a single value, it might be better to estimate the
> number of nodes, the cost to run a query, and the cost per node. That way we
> could optimize to quickly return the first few nodes (versus optimize for
> thoughput).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
