[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13662999#comment-13662999
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on OAK-834:
-------------------------------------
> In general I see the JCR-3534 solution as an artifact of a poor deployment
> architecture driven by the limitations of the Jackrabbit architecture. Thus
> instead of replicating the solution as-is in Oak I'd rather look at making
> sure that Oak can better handle such deployment needs without needing such
> workarounds.
+1
> That said, it looks like for backwards compatibility and for ease of
> migration we'll need to include some level of support for existing Jackrabbit
> DataStores. Perhaps that's a good starting point?
sure
> Efficient copying of binaries across repositories with the same MK
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-834
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: mk
> Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
>
> As a follow up on JCR-3534 discussions and implementation, we should also
> discuss how to handle a similar scenario in Oak.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
