[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13688049#comment-13688049
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-877:
-----------------------------------
bq. Doing so loses at least the timestamps and potentially other local
information associated with events.
We lose the timestamps, true. However, OAK-775 was mainly about the user id and
as long as we aggregate only if events originate from the same session we can
still provide it.
> Generating observation events takes too long when intermediate save calls are
> involved
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-877
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Attachments: 1_save.png, 2.save.png
>
>
> Creating observation events is much more expensive when a transaction is
> broken down through intermediate save calls compared to only having a single
> save call.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
