[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Dürig updated OAK-798:
------------------------------

    Attachment: OAK-798.patch

Proposed patch to unify {{ReadOnlyTree}} and {{ImmutableTree}}
                
> Review / refactor TreeImpl and related classes
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-798
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>         Attachments: OAK-798.patch
>
>
> Now that OAK-781 is nearly complete, I'd like to follow up with pulling the 
> new functionality into {{TreeImpl}} and its friends. A rough sketch of what I 
> have in mind:
> * -Apply the concept of existence and iterability of nodes to {{Tree}} 
> instances. So {{Tree}} would have a method {{exists}} with the same semantics 
> as that on {{NodeBuilder}}. Namely non existing trees could be used to 
> navigate to its children/parent. But can not be used to iterate 
> children/properties nor to modify the tree in any way.- Done at revision 
> 1477010
> * -{{TreeLocation}} and its implementations would go away since trees could 
> be navigated by its own means now.- Done at revision 1478403.
> * Provide two {{Tree}} implementations: {{MutableTree}} and 
> {{ImmutableTree}}. The former would replace {{TreeImpl}} and the latter would 
> unify the current {{ReadOnlyTree}} and {{ImmutableTree}} implementations. 
> Roughly the former would be based on {{NodeBuilder}} while the latter would 
> be based on {{NodeState}}. Only the latter would implement {{equals}} such 
> that two such trees are equal when its underlying node states and its names 
> are equal. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to