[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13765348#comment-13765348
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-1013:
------------------------------------
Thanks for the test case. I committed a slightly edited version at r1522532
> Node.addNode(name) different behavior from JR if NodeType resolves to an
> abstract
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1013
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1013
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jcr
> Affects Versions: 0.8
> Reporter: Christan Keller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Issue.java
>
>
> In Jackrabbit, if you used node.addNode(name) and the NodeType resolved to an
> abstract like nt:base Jackrabbit still persisted the new Node.
> In Oak a ConstraintViolationException is thrown.
> While the Oak behavior is fully Spec complient, it still may be a migration
> issue for JR users.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
