[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13827891#comment-13827891
]
angela commented on OAK-1205:
-----------------------------
see my question above. lets' rephrase it:
i still don't understand what kind of problem you try to address... would you
mind providing some more information what's the intention behind your proposal?
that patch doesn't indicate where this would be used, doesn't make use of it in
other areas of the code base and doesn't add any tests that shed some light on
what you are trying to achieve.
> Enable/Disable security for ImmutableRoot built from a Root
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1205
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1205
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Antonio Sanso
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK1205-patch.txt
>
>
> At the moment when invoking the
> {code}
> public ImmutableRoot(@Nonnull Root root, @Nonnull TreeTypeProvider
> typeProvider) {
> {code}
> constructor there is no way to specify if to specify if the SecureNodeState
> should be use or not.
> Indeed with the current implementation this is always disabled. It would be
> nice to have the explicit choice to have a SecureNodeState or not, e.g. having
> {code}
> public ImmutableRoot(@Nonnull Root root, @Nonnull TreeTypeProvider
> typeProvider, boolean secured) {
> {code}
> I have discussed this with [~mduerig] and we came up with the patch I will
> provide.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
