[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13828022#comment-13828022
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-1206:
------------------------------------
In general I'm fine with this but we should get to an agreement on OAK-74
first. See Julian's [last comment |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-74?focusedCommentId=13624793&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13624793]
for why this is a problem.
> Consider renaming internal nodetypes and item names
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1206
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1206
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> some new nodetypes have the oak namespace but are used only internally. in
> jackrabbit 2.x we used the 'internal' namespace for those.
> I suggest to use the internal namespace for nodes that are not (or should
> not) be created via JCR, namely:
> * rep:NodeType
> * rep:NamedPropertyDefinitions
> * rep:PropertyDefinitions
> * rep:PropertyDefinition
> * rep:NamedChildNodeDefinitions
> * rep:ChildNodeDefinitions
> * rep:ChildNodeDefinition
> see also OAK-1180
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
