[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13830182#comment-13830182
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-1207:
------------------------------------
+1
My instinct would be to use the fixture based on MemoryStore, given that
in-memory test cases are faster and less prone to odd interactions with the
host platform than file-based ones, but I guess for the TCK it makes sense for
the target repository to be as close to real-life deployments as possible and
give the size of the TCK we might also hit heap size constraints with in-memory
store.
> Change OakRepositoryStubBase to use NodeStore setup
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1207
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: jcr
> Reporter: angela
> Attachments: OAK-1207.patch
>
>
> in order to align the default tck setup with our development i would suggest
> to change the following line in OakRepositoryStubBase
> {quote}
> Jcr jcr = new Jcr(new MicroKernelImpl(dir));
> {quote}
> to use a NodeStore instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
