[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13845320#comment-13845320
]
Antonio Sanso commented on OAK-884:
-----------------------------------
.bq oh. thanks... but it still fails on my machine.
the only thing I might think is that jackrabbit-core should be added twice.
The existing one with the tests classifier and the "new one"
{code}
+ <groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit</groupId>
+ <artifactId>jackrabbit-core</artifactId>
+ <version>${jackrabbit.version}</version>
+ <scope>test</scope>
+ </dependency>
{code}
For the rest of the issue you can either revert the patch or I might try to
address the current issues one by one … sorry
> Add simple randomized test
> --------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-884
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-884
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: run
> Reporter: Antonio Sanso
> Fix For: 0.14
>
> Attachments: OAK-884-patch.txt, OAK-884-patch.txt, OAK-884-patch.txt
>
>
> Taking as example org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.mongomk.RandomizedTest it
> would be nice to have some randomized test also for the ACL evaluation.
> The logic for the upcoming test patch is to add/remove randomly read
> permission entry and traverse the tree evaluation the read permission.
> The result is compared with a Jackrabbit (that is considered as a functional
> gold implementation) outcome and it is expected to match.
> Should not match then we have a problem...
> Patch to follow
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)
