[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13871943#comment-13871943
 ] 

Thomas Mueller edited comment on OAK-1157 at 1/15/14 11:22 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

[~ajain], the patch seems to contain duplicate changes (see also JCR-3705), 
would it be possible to shrink the patch?

The patch uses joptsimple (MIT license, "JOpt Simple is a Java library for 
parsing command line options, such as those you might pass to an invocation of 
javac."). I wonder if this is really needed?

There are some comments that simply refer to the interface, I wonder if they 
add value? If not could you remove them? Example:

{code}
+    /* (non-Javadoc)
+     * @see org.apache.jackrabbit.data.Backend#close()
+     */
+    @Override
+    public void close() throws DataStoreException {
+        dataStore.close();
+    }
{code}

There seems to be code duplication. For example, 
MongoCloudBlobStoreTest.testCombinedIdentifier seems to be a 1:1 copy of the 
source code of the existing MongoBlobStoreTest. Could this and other 
duplications be avoided?




was (Author: tmueller):
[~ajain], the patch seems to contain duplicate changes (see also JCR-3705), 
would it be possible to shrink the patch?

The patch uses joptsimple (MIT license, "JOpt Simple is a Java library for 
parsing command line options, such as those you might pass to an invocation of 
javac."). I wonder if this is really needed?

There are some javadocs that simply refer to the interface, I wonder if they 
add value? If not could you remove them? Example:

{code}
+    /* (non-Javadoc)
+     * @see org.apache.jackrabbit.data.Backend#close()
+     */
+    @Override
+    public void close() throws DataStoreException {
+        dataStore.close();
+    }
{code}

There seems to be code duplication. For example, 
MongoCloudBlobStoreTest.testCombinedIdentifier seems to be a 1:1 copy of the 
source code of the existing MongoBlobStoreTest. Could this and other 
duplications be avoided?



> DS implementation for S3-based DSs
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1157
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Michael Marth
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>             Fix For: 0.15
>
>         Attachments: OAK-1157.patch
>
>
> Related to OAK-805
> I think we need a DS implementation for the lately introduced S3 DS in 
> Jackrabbit 2, so that users of that DS can easily migrate to Oak
> I think it would anyway be a very useful DS implementation to have, also for 
> Oak



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to