[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878409#comment-13878409
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-1286:
-------------------------------------
[~lauriebyrum], I see now access rights is easy to do. First I thought the
query is supposed to return words (as in the Google feature "did you mean"),
but now I see it is supposed to return nodes. Yes, we do check access rights on
nodes, so that's not a problem at all.
For queries of type "did you mean", where the index doesn't return nodes but
words, access right checks are probably harder to do. But let's think about
that when it comes up.
> Enable/expose MoreLikeThis queries
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1286
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1286
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: oak-lucene
> Reporter: Laurie byrum
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
> Fix For: 0.16
>
>
> The software I'm building currently makes use of Lucene's MoreLikeThis \[1\]
> facilities in order to match user's search with Nodes in a JCR repository.
> MoreLikeThis gives us much better results than, for example, simple full text
> search.
> We have currently implemented this by having our own Lucene indices. For
> simplicity and efficiency, we'd prefer to use the copy of Lucene that is
> already built into Oak. To do so, I think we would need to add an indexer
> config. We would also need a way to pass such queries through the jcr query
> api. We would need something very similar to "rep:similar", but we would want
> to be able to pass the similar text through the api (I believe the current
> rep:similar can only take a node to be matched, as opposed to text to be
> matched).
> \[1\]
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/3_0_3/api/contrib-queries/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
