[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Marth updated OAK-1013:
-------------------------------

    Assignee: Jukka Zitting  (was: Michael Dürig)

> Node.addNode(name) different behavior from JR if NodeType resolves to an 
> abstract
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1013
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1013
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jcr
>    Affects Versions: 0.8
>            Reporter: Christan Keller
>            Assignee: Jukka Zitting
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.19
>
>         Attachments: Issue.java
>
>
> In Jackrabbit, if you used node.addNode(name) and the NodeType resolved to an 
> abstract like nt:base Jackrabbit still persisted the new Node.
> In Oak a ConstraintViolationException is thrown.
> While the Oak behavior is fully Spec complient, it still may be a migration 
> issue for JR users.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to