[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13963083#comment-13963083
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-1702:
--------------------------------------
Combined benchmark results
{noformat}
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.21.0-SNAPSHOT
# FullTextSearchTest C min 10% 50% 90% max
N
Oak-Mongo 1 58 71 101 119 287
610
Oak-Mongo-FDS 1 50 51 52 58 184
1106
Oak-Tar 1 39 40 40 44 64
1459
Oak-Tar-FDS 1 53 54 55 64 197
1030
Jackrabbit 1 4 4 5 6 231
11385
{noformat}
So it appears that Full text Oak is very slow compared to JR2
> Create a benchmark for Full text search
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: bench
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attachments: OAK-1702.patch
>
>
> To compare the performance of Full text search between Jackrabbit 2 and Oak a
> benchmark should be added.
> To start with the benchmark would do following
> * Would be based on WikipediaImport benchmark. So it would import the
> wikipedia dump and perform full text query on that
> * Should be able to run on both JR2 and Oak. Need to account for maven setup
> to handle different Lucene version as JR2 uses 3.6.0 and Oak use 4.x
> Later we can add concurrent version
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
