[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13990628#comment-13990628
 ] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-1491:
------------------------------------

Created a branch on my Github fork for instrumenting the code to track this 
down: https://github.com/mduerig/jackrabbit-oak/tree/OAK-1491

> ObservationTest failure on Windows
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1491
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1491
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core, jcr
>         Environment: http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk-win7
>            Reporter: Michael Dürig
>            Assignee: Michael Dürig
>              Labels: observation
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> {{ObservationTest}} fails often on some Windows machines:
> {noformat}
> pathFilter[3](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.observation.ObservationTest)  
> Time elapsed: 0.864 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Missing events: [path = 
> /events/only/here/below/this, type = 1]
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.observation.ObservationTest.pathFilter(ObservationTest.java:315)
> {noformat}
> and
> {noformat}
> filterPropertyOfParent[2](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.observation.ObservationTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.88 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: Missing events: [path = 
> /test_node/a/jcr:primaryType, type = 4, path = /test_node/a/foo, type = 4, 
> path = /test_node/a/b, type = 1]
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>       at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.observation.ObservationTest.filterPropertyOfParent(ObservationTest.java:614)
> {noformat}
> I have the suspicion this is an issue with the test similar to OAK-1486



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to