[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jukka Zitting updated OAK-1945:
-------------------------------

    Description: 
The SegmentMK doesn't respect the #merge contract when there is a builder that 
has no local changes passed in.
This popped-up while I was reworking the restore parts and with the new 
compaction code, the only option is to pass in a NodeState#Builder builder 
which is considered by the #merge method as a noop and therefore ignored.

(update: See comments below)

  was:
The SegmentMK doesn't respect the #merge contract when there is a builder that 
has no local changes passed in.
This popped-up while I was reworking the restore parts and with the new 
compaction code, the only option is to pass in a NodeState#Builder builder 
which is considered by the #merge method as a noop and therefore ignored.

        Summary: Unclear NodeStore.merge() contract  (was: SegmentMK #merge 
inconsistency)

> Unclear NodeStore.merge() contract
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1945
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
>         Attachments: MergeTest.java.patch
>
>
> The SegmentMK doesn't respect the #merge contract when there is a builder 
> that has no local changes passed in.
> This popped-up while I was reworking the restore parts and with the new 
> compaction code, the only option is to pass in a NodeState#Builder builder 
> which is considered by the #merge method as a noop and therefore ignored.
> (update: See comments below)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to