[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14079008#comment-14079008
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-1996:
-------------------------------------
Do we talk about "order by @jcr:score ascending" or "descending"?
I think "order by @jcr:score desc" is very common, and is needed for many cases
where you don't care about the result set size.
I think it's better to fix the applications that rely on getSize instead. To do
that, we could make getSize() return -1 in all cases if a certain setting is
used, to simplify testing the application.
> let 'order by @jcr:score' trigger automatic result set size calculation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1996
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1996
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
> Affects Versions: 1.0.3
> Reporter: Torgeir Veimo
>
> It would probably be a good idea to make the "order by @jcr:score"
> suffix trigger automatic result set size calculation in getSize() for
> better backwards compatibility.
> This would make oak more compatible with applications relying on this
> behaviour from jackrabbit 2.8 and earlier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
