[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Przemo Pakulski updated OAK-2010:
---------------------------------

    Description: 
Whilst working with MongoMk had problems with BlobGarbageCollector, it didn't 
remove redundant blobs at all.
When enabled debug logging I found the following entry in log files:
{code}
30.07.2014 19:23:32.922 *DEBUG* [pool-5-thread-2] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Number of 
blobs present in BlobStore : [0] which have been last modified before 
[2011-11-03 18:23:32.922]
{code}
Looks that GC is considering only almost 3 years old blobs by default.

  was:
Whilst working with MongoMk had problems with BlobGarbageCollector, it didn't 
remove redundant blobs at all.
When enabled debug logging I found the following entry in log files:
{code}
30.07.2014 19:23:32.922 *DEBUG* [pool-5-thread-2] 
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Number of 
blobs present in BlobStore : [0] which have been last modified before 
[2011-11-03 18:23:32.922]
{code}
Looks that GC is considering only +3 years old blobs by default.


> BlobGcMaxAgeInSecs is set to high for MongoBlobStore
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-2010
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2010
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: blob, mongomk
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.2
>            Reporter: Przemo Pakulski
>         Attachments: OAK-2010.patch
>
>
> Whilst working with MongoMk had problems with BlobGarbageCollector, it didn't 
> remove redundant blobs at all.
> When enabled debug logging I found the following entry in log files:
> {code}
> 30.07.2014 19:23:32.922 *DEBUG* [pool-5-thread-2] 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.MarkSweepGarbageCollector Number of 
> blobs present in BlobStore : [0] which have been last modified before 
> [2011-11-03 18:23:32.922]
> {code}
> Looks that GC is considering only almost 3 years old blobs by default.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to