[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14386391#comment-14386391
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh edited comment on OAK-2673 at 3/30/15 8:34 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks [~mreutegg] for reviewing. I'm uploading another 
[patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12708114/OAK-2673-Adding-resolution-of-same-name-conflicts-ad%28take2%29.patch]
 with changes that you mentioned. Along with that I've added a small change in 
{{SingleInstanceConflictUtility.generateConflict}} method for better reporting 
of exception in case conflict wasn't expected.





was (Author: catholicon):
Thanks [~mreutegg] for reviewing. I'm uploading another 
[patch|^OAK-2673-Adding-resolution-of-same-name-conflicts-ad(take2)] with 
changes that you mentioned. Along with that I've added a small change in 
{{SingleInstanceConflictUtility.generateConflict}} method for better reporting 
of exception in case conflict wasn't expected.

> Resolve add-add, delete-delete merge conflict for empty hidden docs
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-2673
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2673
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: mongomk
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: 
> OAK-2673-Adding-resolution-of-same-name-conflicts-ad(take2).patch, 
> OAK-2673-HiddenNodeSameNameMergeConflict.patch
>
>
> While OAK-1550 is about general fix for resolving same node merge conflicts. 
> But until general issue is fixed, we should special case for hidden nodes 
> (e.g. index sub-tree).
> Discussed offline with [~mreutegg] and [~chetanm] about handling merge 
> conflict for hidden nodes. Main concern to not resolve the conflict seemed to 
> be observation (specifying/declaring what events reach which clients). For 
> hidden nodes, observation isn't a concern. Along with that, in heavy write 
> scenarios there are some cases (I'm aware of property index updates) which 
> often cause conflicts -- thereby wasting some time during merge attempts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to