[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14493798#comment-14493798
]
angela commented on OAK-2712:
-----------------------------
I refactored the SessionOperation#perform such that the default method is
annotated as with {{@Nonnull}} while at the same time introducing 2 new methods
for operations that may return {{null}} and those that don't expect any return
value. Fixing this required broader changes than just to {{ItemImpl}} but now
all {{SessionOperation}} calls should be fine and no longer violating the
nullable-contract.
Committed revision 1673387.
> Possible null-dereference when calling ItemImpl#perform
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2712
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2712
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jcr
> Reporter: angela
> Labels: technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> FindBugs complains about usages of ItemImpl#perform that is annotated with
> {{@CheckForNull}} but callers expecting a non-null return value.... most
> prominently in NodeImpl
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
