[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14605659#comment-14605659
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2909:
------------------------------------
I think we should concentrate on the first point for now and discuss the 2nd
and 3rd on the list first so we are all on the same page on the direction this
is taking.
> Review and improve Oak and Jcr repository setup
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2909
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2909
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jcr
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Labels: modularization, technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.3.2
>
>
> There is the {{Oak}} and {{Jcr}} builder classes for setting up Oak and Jcr
> repositories. Both builders don't have clear semantics regarding the life
> cycle of the individual components they register. On top of that the
> requirements regarding those life cycles differ depending on whether the
> individual components run within an OSGi container or not. In the former case
> the container would already manage the life cycle so the builder should not.
> IMO we should specify the builders to only be used for non OSGi deployments
> and have the manage the life cycles of the components they instantiate. OTOH
> for OSGi deployments we should leverage OSGi subsystems to properly set
> things up.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
