[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14620168#comment-14620168
 ] 

Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3003:
------------------------------------

Briefly looked into the patch:
* I'd make the unit of the cache expiration time minutes instead of 
milliseconds to avoid hitting the repository with too many cache updates. 
* Not sure whether there is enough guarding in place against concurrent cache 
updates. 
* The current design seems to expose some inconsistency when group memberships 
change as this doesn't seem to invalidate the cache. I wouldn't know how 
problematic this is though. 

> Improve login performance with huge group membership
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3003
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>         Attachments: OAK-3003.patch, group_cache_in_userprincipalprovider.txt
>
>
> As visible when running {{LoginWithMembershipTest}} default login performance 
> (which uses the {{o.a.j.oak.security.principal.PrincipalProviderImpl}} to 
> lookup the complete set of principals) suffers when a given user is member of 
> a huge number of groups (see also OAK-2690 for benchmark data).
> While using dynamic group membership (and thus a custom {{PrincipalProvider}} 
> would be the preferable way to deal with this, we still want to optimize 
> {{PrincipalProvider.getPrincipals(String userId}} for the default 
> implementation.
> With the introduction of a less generic implementation in OAK-2690, we might 
> be able to come up with an optimization that makes use of the very 
> implementation details of the user management while at the same time being 
> able to properly secure it as we won't need to extend the public API.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to