[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14711339#comment-14711339
]
Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-3263 at 8/25/15 2:14 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thx [~chetanm], [~tmueller]
bq .May be in leave method bringing the whole code block under if we flip the
condition and if != INCLUDE then return and leave rest of the code as is
That's what I did initially, but then I though that we'd still need the if
(parent == null) part at the end of the method.
was (Author: baedke):
Thx [~chetanm], [~mueller],
bq .May be in leave method bringing the whole code block under if we flip the
condition and if != INCLUDE then return and leave rest of the code as is
That's what I did initially, but then I though that we'd still need the if
(parent == null) part at the end of the method.
> Support including and excluding paths for PropertyIndex
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3263
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3263
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 1.3.6
>
> Attachments: OAK-3263-prelimary.patch
>
>
> As part of OAK-2599 support for excluding and including paths were added to
> Lucene index. It would be good to have such a support enabled for
> PropertyIndexe also
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
