[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14712966#comment-14712966
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-3230:
-------------------------------------
> I'm not sure of the version change part. Would that mean that we should find
> some other (api wise backward compatible) change?
No, I will upgrade the version. I don't think it's a problem.
> Query engine should support virtual index rows
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3230
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: query
> Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
> Fix For: 1.3.5
>
> Attachments: OAK-3230-query-engine-should-support-virtual-rows.patch
>
>
> As discussed in OAK-3156
> [here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3156?focusedCommentId=14645712&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14645712]
> and
> [here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3156?focusedCommentId=14655273&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14655273],
> we need support for virtual rows returned by indices (rows where path
> property doesn't make sense).
> Talked to [~tmueller] and we should have a new method in {{IndexRow}} to
> clearly mark the intent that the row is virtual and hence should be treated
> accordingly by the query engine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
