[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14902260#comment-14902260
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3371:
--------------------------------------
[~edivad] For me testcase is failing at
{code}
assertQuery(
"SELECT * FROM [nt:unstructured] WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE('/test')
AND CONTAINS(foo, 'bar OR cat')",
of("/test/d"));
{code}
With
{noformat}
java.lang.AssertionError: Result set size is different
Expected :1
Actual :3
<Click to see difference>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.AbstractQueryTest.assertQuery(AbstractQueryTest.java:314)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.AbstractQueryTest.assertQuery(AbstractQueryTest.java:305)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.AbstractQueryTest.assertQuery(AbstractQueryTest.java:283)
at
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexQueryTest.oak3371(LuceneIndexQueryTest.java:549)
{noformat}
I was expecting the last assertion to fail. So before I dig further wanted to
check if thats the current state of patch or I missed something?
> Wrong evaluation of NOT clause
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3371
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
> Affects Versions: 1.2.4, 1.3.5
> Reporter: Davide Giannella
> Assignee: Davide Giannella
> Fix For: 1.3.7
>
> Attachments: OAK-3371-2.patch, OAK-3371-3-oak-core.patch,
> OAK-3371-4-notworking.patch, OAK-3371-test.diff, OAK-3371.patch
>
>
> When executing a query like
> {noformat}
> SELECT * FROM [nt:unstructured] WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE([/test]) AND NOT
> CONTAINS(foo, 'bar')
> {noformat}
> and the {{nodeType}} index plays the not clause is not applied properly.
> Nodes **with** the property are returned as well.
> [test|^OAK-3371-test.diff] showing the bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
