[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14998532#comment-14998532
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3348:
------------------------------------
[^OAK-3348-2.patch] is still not sufficient: segment node builders having been
acquired before a gc cylcle flushing (through
{{SegmentNodeBuilder.getNodeState()}} afterwards will add back references from
the current segment (post gc) to an older segment (pre gc).
I think we need to try to fix this differently. An idea would be to add guards
in the segment writer to avoid creating back references. I.e. the segment
writer would check whether a certain reference links to a pre gc segment and if
so, would rewrite the associated record on the fly.
> Cross gc sessions might introduce references to pre-compacted segments
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3348
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3348
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: segmentmk
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Assignee: Michael Dürig
> Labels: cleanup, compaction, gc
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: OAK-3348-1.patch, OAK-3348-2.patch, OAK-3348.patch,
> cross-gc-refs.pdf, image.png
>
>
> I suspect that certain write operations during compaction can cause
> references from compacted segments to pre-compacted ones. This would
> effectively prevent the pre-compacted segments from getting evicted in
> subsequent cleanup phases.
> The scenario is as follows:
> * A session is opened and a lot of content is written to it such that the
> update limit is exceeded. This causes the changes to be written to disk.
> * Revision gc runs causing a new, compacted root node state to be written to
> disk.
> * The session saves its changes. This causes rebasing of its changes onto the
> current root (the compacted one). At this point any node that has been added
> will be added again in the sub-tree rooted at the current root. Such nodes
> however might have been written to disk *before* revision gc ran and might
> thus be contained in pre-compacted segments. As I suspect the node-add
> operation in the rebasing process *not* to create a deep copy of such nodes
> but to rather create a *reference* to them, a reference to a pre-compacted
> segment is introduced here.
> Going forward we need to validate above hypothesis, assess its impact if
> necessary come up with a solution.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
