[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15055812#comment-15055812
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-3742:
--------------------------------------
to air on the side of safety I would not drop the classes right away, I'd
prefer moving them to a proper package.
the backup and restore functionality has value, it's just the way it was
exposed as jmx is a bit awkward, and the package references go against
modularity, so moving them should fix the problem.
What I would be in favor of is dropping support for backup/restore in oak-run,
seeing as a backup is a plain copy of a repository (taken also online, no need
to stop it).
tiny observation on
{{oak-run/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/run/Main.java}}, the patch
changes the imports quite a bit, and I assume this comes from IDE auto imports
cleanup or something. In my view it would be better to not include this in the
commit itself.
> FileStoreBackup and FileStoreRestore have a reference on Segment Store classes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3742
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3742
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Francesco Mari
> Assignee: Francesco Mari
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: OAK-3742-01.patch
>
>
> {{FileStoreBackup}} and {{FileStoreRestore}} reference classes for the
> Segment Store packages to create and initialise a store for backup and
> restore. This direct reference makes difficult to move the Segment Store into
> its own independent bundle.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)