[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105334#comment-15105334
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3892:
-------------------------------------

I wanted to make sure (on the source level) that we actually have the same Lock 
implementations; this seemed to be the easiest way without relying on 
out-of-band information.

> RDBDocumentStore: StripedNodeDocumentLocks - special case root?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3892
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3892
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: rdbmk
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: stripes.diff
>
>
> {{StripedNodeDocumentLocks}} currently handles all document IDs the same way.
> I assume that we see a lot of updates on {{0:/}}, though. These updates would 
> be blocked if another different ID fell into the same lock stripe (and was 
> being updated).
> We currently have 4096, so the likelihood isn't that big; on the other hand, 
> a change doesn't seem to be risky.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to