[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15111340#comment-15111340
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh edited comment on OAK-2477 at 1/21/16 10:01 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

For suggestions we have 2 type of configs for sugggestions: 
{{suggestUpdateFrequencyMinutes, suggestAnalyzed}} (currently gets defined at 
index def node) and {{useInSuggest}} (set on each property def which should 
participate in suggestions dictionary).

Had a chat with [~chetanm] and it seems that having {{useInSuggest}} is 
useful... so, we might just want to namespace {{suggestUpdateFrequencyMinutes, 
suggestAnalyzed}} into its own config node under index def (say 
//indexDef/{{suggestion}}). [~teofili] wdyt?


was (Author: catholicon):
For suggestions we have 2 config: {{suggestUpdateFrequencyMinutes}} (currently 
gets defined at index def node) and {{useInSuggest}} (set on each property def 
which should participate in suggestions dictionary).

Had a chat with [~chetanm] and it seems that having {{useInSuggest}} is 
useful... so, we might just want to namespace {{suggestUpdateFrequencyMinutes}} 
into its own config node under index def (say //indexDef/{{suggestion}}). 
[~teofili] wdyt?

> Move suggester specific config to own configuration node
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-2477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2477
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>              Labels: docs-impacting, technical_debt
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> Currently suggester configuration is controlled via properties defined on 
> main config / props node but it'd be good if we would have its own place to 
> configure the whole suggest feature to not mix up configuration of other 
> features / parameters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to