[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15115163#comment-15115163
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-3576:
------------------------------------
Adding label for backporting to 1.2. In our preliminary tests, the extension
logic doesn't add any overhead. We are running another test. Once that test
confirms that there aren't any obvious side-effects, I'd backport it 1.2.
(cc [~chetanm], [~teofili])
> Allow custom extension to augment indexed lucene documents
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3576
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3576
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
> Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
> Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Labels: candidate_oak_1_2
> Fix For: 1.3.13
>
> Attachments: OAK-3576.jsedding.patch, OAK-3576.take2.patch,
> OAK-3576.wip.patch
>
>
> Following up on http://oak.markmail.org/thread/a53ahsgb3bowtwyq, we should
> have an extension point in oak to allow custom code to add fields to
> documents getting indexed in lucene. We'd also need to allow extension point
> to add extra query terms to utilize such augmented fields.
> (cc [~teofili], [~chetanm])
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
