[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15263953#comment-15263953
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-4300:
-------------------------------------
I created OAK-4323 for fixing the query engine (this is more or less
independent of this issue, but goes in the same direction)
> Cost per entry for Lucene index of type v1 should be higher than that of v2
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4300
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5.2
>
>
> Currently default cost per entry for Lucene index of type
> # v1 - which uses query time aggregation
> # v2 - which uses index time aggregation
> Are same. However given that query time aggregation would require more effort
> it should result in a higher cost per entry.
> This fact impacts the result in cases like OAK-2081 (see last few comments)
> where with usage of limits both index are currently considered equals
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
