[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15318119#comment-15318119
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-4422:
---------------------------------------
I think there's a bit of confusion in terminology. Or maybe it's me
not understanding.
When you speak of FileBlobStore I associate it to the Datastore which
is "different" from the {{NodeStore}}. The NodeStore is the part you
think about clustering using a DocumentNodeStore implementation.
AFAIK you can configure any of our DocumentNS implementation (Mongo
and RDB) with a FileBlobStore.
When it comes to clustering you can then decide to dedicate a
FileBlobStore for each individual cluster node, having therefore
multiple copies of the same binary, or opt for a shared Datastore to
be used by all the cluster nodes.
Don't remember if we have any utilities for moving from Segment to
Document.
Would this solve your situation?
> support cluster for FileBlobStore
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4422
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4422
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: blob
> Affects Versions: 1.4.3
> Reporter: Marco Piovesana
>
> I'm using Oak in a system where the user can store arbitrary large binary
> files and because of that I thought the best option was to use the
> FileBlobStore as storage subsystem.
> Now I need to port this solution on a cluster environment, but i saw that
> clustering is supported only for Mongo and RDBMS storage systems. Is there
> any plan to suppor it also for the Blob storage? There's a better option?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
