[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Francesco Mari resolved OAK-4349.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Resolving this issue as won't fix, since the described situation doesn't seem 
to be a problem. Recent work (see OAK-4650 and linked issue) seems to suggest 
that decoupling command line utilities in a front- and back-end part is a 
better approach to defeat complexity in oak-run.

> Commands in oak-run should not implement NodeStore creation logic from scratch
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4349
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4349
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: run
>            Reporter: Francesco Mari
>            Assignee: Francesco Mari
>         Attachments: OAK-4349-01.patch, OAK-4349-02.patch
>
>
> Many commands in oak-run implement the same logic over and over to create a 
> {{NodeStore}} from command line arguments. I think it would be better to have 
> this logic in a single  place and reuse it from every command.
> In OAK-4246 I proposed an approach based on URIs. Instead of specified 
> command line arguments and flags, a connection to a specific backend could be 
> specified using a URI with application specific schemas. On OAK-4246 I showed 
> some examples specific to the {{SegmentNodeStore}}:
> - {{segment:///path/to/dir}} opens an "old style" segment store at the 
> specified folder.
> - {{segment:tar:///path/to/dir}} opens a"new style" segment store at the 
> specified folder.
> - {{segment:tar:///path/to/dir?mm=false}} opens a "new style" segment store 
> at the specified folder and disables memory mapped files.
> A solution based on URIs can be extended to other {{NodeStore}} 
> implementations by using other schemes like {{segment:mem}}, 
> {{document:mongo}}, {{document:rdb}}, and so on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to