[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chetan Mehrotra resolved OAK-4713.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.5.13

Main parts done. Specific issues can be opened later on

> Builder class to simplify Lucene Index Definition building
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4713
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4713
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.13
>
>         Attachments: OAK-4713-v1.patch
>
>
> Currently there are various ways to build Lucene index definition. The 
> approach varies from code to code and at level they are working. Like test 
> case working at NodeState api, Tree api or higher level Jcr api. To simplify 
> creating index definition I would like to add a builder class.
> *Usage*
> {code}
> IndexDefinitionBuilder builder = new IndexDefinitionBuilder();
> builder.indexRule("nt:base")
>             .property("foo")
>                 .ordered()
>         .enclosingRule()
>             .property("bar")
>                 .analyzed()
>                 .propertyIndex()
>         .enclosingRule()
>             .property("baz")
>             .propertyIndex();
> //Defining aggregate rules
> builder.aggregateRule("cq:Page").include("jcr:content").relativeNode();
> builder.aggregateRule("dam:Asset", "*", "*/*");
> builder.build(); //Returns NodeState
> builder.build(tree); //Copies the definition to tree
> builder.build(node); //Copies the definition to JCR Node
> {code}
> The builder was being used so far in oakutils [1]
> [1] 
> https://github.com/chetanmeh/oakutils/blob/master/src/main/java/com/chetanmeh/oak/index/config/IndexDefinitionBuilder.java



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to