[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15875535#comment-15875535
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-5229:
---------------------------------------
bq. internal properties that only make sense in combination with the respective
type
While this is true, we never restricted their usage on nodes with a type that
allows those properties. This is exactly the case in those tests. The node type
allows those properties. The basic idea of the proposal is to only remove items
that are not covered by definitions anymore when the type changes. IMO it
should be up to the application to decide whether it wants to keep such items
or not. See also Angela's [earlier comment|#comment-15865483].
> Using Node.setPrimaryType() should fail if non-matching childnodes
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-5229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5229
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.5.14
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.8, 1.6.1
>
> Attachments: OAK-5229.patch, OAK-5229-tests.patch, OAK-5229-v2.patch,
> OAK-5229-v3.patch, OAK-5229-v4.patch, OAK-5229-v5.patch
>
>
> 1. Assume the following:
> {noformat}
> /testNode [nt:unstructured]
> /unstructured_child [nt:unstructured]
> {noformat}
> 2. setting "/testNode".setPrimaryType("nt:folder")
> 3. save the session.
> Altering the primary type works, thus leaving the repository in an
> inconsistent state.
> Interestingly, subsequent calls to
> "/testNiode/unstructured_child".setProperty() will fail:
> {noformat}
> javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: OakConstraint0001:
> /test_node[[nt:folder]]: No matching definition found for child node
> unstructured_child with effective type [nt:unstructured]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
