[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011924#comment-16011924
]
angela edited comment on OAK-6093 at 5/16/17 9:10 AM:
------------------------------------------------------
Revision 1795274:
- extend TreeUtil to cover commonly used functionality from NodeUtil
- replace usage of NodeUtil by TreeUtil in non-test code
- move NodeUtil to test-code, where it is mainly used
Revision 1795281:
- move TreeUtil to oak/plugins/tree
- delete oak/util
was (Author: anchela):
Revision 1795274:
- extend TreeUtil to cover commonly used functionality from NodeUtil
- replace usage of NodeUtil by TreeUtil in non-test code
- move NodeUtil to test-code, where it is mainly used"
> Find a new home for NodeUtil and TreeUtil including cleanup
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6093
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core
> Reporter: angela
> Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.8
>
>
> see
> http://markmail.org/message/fczbcadrosg3k6x4?q=ApproximateCounter+list:org%2Eapache%2Ejackrabbit%2Eoak-dev+from:%22Robert+Munteanu%22&page=1
> for the corresponding discussion.
> As mentioned in the issue and discussed with [~mduerig] in private I would
> also suggest that we try to get rid of the duplicated functionality. Those 2
> classes do almost the same thing and I am not totally convinced that we
> really need to keep both... but I would like to hear other opinions on this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
