[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16042655#comment-16042655
]
angela commented on OAK-6304:
-----------------------------
[~tmueller], on a second look it seems that the export statement for
_o.a.j.oak.query.index_ was not really needed by the oak code base _if_ I move
{{Cursors}} utility and introduce {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.Filter.EMPTY_FILTER}}
for {{o.a.j.oak.composite.CrossMountReferenceValidator}} in
_oak-store-composite_, which is the only productive usage of {{FilterImpl}}
outside of _oak-core_. All the other usage are test-only. I will attach a new
patch for review.
> Cyclic dependency between oak.spi.query an oak.query.*
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6304
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core, indexing, query
> Reporter: angela
> Attachments: OAK-6304.patch, OAK-6304-test.patch
>
>
> while working on OAK-6069 i noticed that there exist IMO troublesome
> dependencies from _o.a.j.oak.spi.query_ back to _o.a.j.oak.query.*_. While i
> don't know the historical reasons that led to this setup it feels wrong to me
> that the interfaces and classes in _o.a.j.oak.spi.query_ would have
> dependencies to packages that from my understanding are supposed to contain
> implementations.
> while utilities like {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.Cursors}} may simply have ended up
> in the wrong bucket and could possibly moved to e.g _o.a.j.query.index_, i
> couldn't find an easy solution for an interface like
> {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.Filter}} that defines methods returning
> {{o.a.j.query.fulltext.FullTextExpression}} and
> {{o.a.j.query.QueryEngineSettings}}, while at the same time being tied to the
> {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.QueryIndex}} interface.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
