[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16048999#comment-16048999
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6344:
------------------------------------

Good point. Would keep this in mind while doing it.

> IndexDefinitionBuilder should not set reindex flag on additional include paths
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6344
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6344
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> Additional include paths doesn't require indices to be rebuilt to be usable.
> But, currently, provisioning an index with just an additional include path 
> would set the reindex flag. While reindexing would indeed clean up some 
> indexed paths - but reindexing isn't necessary in this case. Otoh, reindexing 
> comes with a heavy cost.
> So, it might be useful to not set reindex flag on additional included paths.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to