[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16091504#comment-16091504
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-6463:
--------------------------------------
bq. I'm wondering if the 'index' supplier should not be wrapped into a
Suppliers.memoize call so you'd get the same NodeBuilder instance on each
.get() call
Makes sense.
Applied a modified patch which uses memoize supplier with r1802288
> Property index update fails in composite NodeStore setup
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6463
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6463
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: composite, property-index
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.4
>
> Attachments: OAK-6463-v1.patch
>
>
> In a CompositeNodeStore setup involving 1 read only mount a commit involving
> update of property index may fail even if the commit does not update content
> under read only paths
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
